Home › User account

Eva Cox

Bio

Eva Cox was until recently Program Director, Social Inquiry at the University of Technology Sydney, and is the national Chair of the Women's Electoral Lobby. She is a Centre for Policy Development fellow.

Eva Cox's contributions:

Mean tests: middle class welfare or redistributive fairness?

Arguing in favour of universal paid maternity leave, Eva Cox scrutinises means tests and government payments.


CPD Road Test: child care rebate

Eva Cox takes the child care rebate for a spin and finds it wanting.


Canberra fails to meet the work-family benchmark

The Australian Work and Family Policy Roundtable recently released benchmarks for the assessment of policy proposals for improving work and family outcomes in Australia. CPD fellow Eva Cox examines how the major parties’ 2007 election announcements shape up so far.


Making time and taking our time

We save it, spend it, invest it, and waste it, yet we never have enough of it. Time is a finite resource, and we seem to be running out. Political parties who ignore the latest research on what time-poverty is doing to our relationships don't deserve to spend time in government, argues Eva Cox.


Balancing the time budget

Time is the currency of relationships, but the never-ending expansion of our working lives is leading to a social recession. Australia's leading social capital expert Eva Cox argues for policies to help us reclaim our time.


Bronwyn’s no solutions report

Last week’s report on ‘Balancing Work and Family’ fails to address the inadequate supply of children’s services, which is undermining choice and leading to ever-rising costs, writes Eva Cox.


What kind of Australia do we want?

Eva Cox explains what governments can do to appeal to the ‘better angels’ in human nature.


Understanding what the Federal Government means by choice

Choice is out of fashion in Canberra, writes Eva Cox. These days service provision is all about control


Child Care funding - policy proposals for discussion

Eva Cox cuts through the confusion surrounding the child care debate and puts forward a comprehensive set of proposals for funding accessible, affordable, quality child care. By introducing direct funding of child care centres to complement fee relief for parents, governments can help to break the profit-driven cycle of fee hikes and supply shortages in the current system.


Improving the Proposed IR & Welfare Systems for Women

Eva Cox explores some of the problems for women workers under the proposed new IR and welfare laws and proposes avenues for mitigating the damage.


Changing child care policy frameworks

Eva Cox argues that changes in government child care 'policy have encouraged rising fees, poor planning and irresponsibility in spending'. She proposes that 'the government move back to funding centres, not parents, as was done in the early days of the program and as is done with nursing homes'.


Defining the role of the state

Eva Cox explores how the policy development role has changed over the years and identifies a range of issues for policy makers and the community to consider


Dog whistle welfare

Eva Cox writes, 'If the Government were upfront about its reluctance to fund all low income households to stay at home with children, they would not find so much support.'


A social plimsoll line?

When citizens are treated like consumers they become subject to all the risks contained in the old Latin phrase caveat emptor - let the buyer beware, writes Eva Cox.



This site is the home of the Centre for Policy Development. It is kindly hosted for us by .
Contact us if you'd like to know more about what you see here.