Real world economics

Critiques of orthodox economics have proliferated in recent times, but often these critiques are not translated into alternative principles for policy-making. The Centre for Policy Development's 'Real World Economics' program provides a platform for our fellows and others to explore approaches which move beyond the ‘small government vs big government' debate and provide the basis for consistent policy-making across portfolios.

Much of the thinking that informs current government policy is based on outdated or oversimplified economic theory — recent applied research (for example in behavioural economics) is often not taken into account. We need to incorporate a broader, more balanced understanding of human nature into the economic principles that underpin policy development.

You can see a lot by just looking: Understanding human judgement in financial decision-making

In this paper CPD fellow Ian McAuley outlines the main implications of behavioural economics for financial decision-making, breaking down the myth that market participants are always rational decision-makers who act to maximise their own best interests.

The future of regulation

The Hon Lindsay Tanner MP addressed the CPD in Melbourne on Wednesday September 10. In his address, Mr Tanner described his role as Minister for Deregulation as much more than 'Dr No': "deregulation is a lot more than simply striking out poor regulation. We want to ensure that the Commonwealth develops the capability to regulate better...Achieving this will...require us to open up the regulatory reform process to include the insights of those citizens and firms who are subject to regulation."

Broadening Financial Understanding Summit

CPD fellow Ian McAuley will talk about financial decision-making at the Australian Bankers' Association summit on Broadening Financial Understanding in Sydney on July 2.

In Defence of Multilateralism

Is multilateralism back on the Australian governments’ agenda? What implications could this have for international security and stability and Australian democracy? CPD fellow James Arvanitakis and Amy Tyler examine multilateralism in a post-September 11 and post-John Howard world, examining Colombia as a case study for change.

Australia's Fiscal Straightjacket

In his new discussion paper for the Centre for Policy Development, Fred Argy demolishes eight myths underpinning what currently passes for "fiscal conservatism" in Australia. The view that neither taxes nor public debt levels should ever increase is lazy and timid policy, not good governance, writes Argy.

Deeper in Debt

Australians are addicted to debt but we can't afford to keep borrowing at current levels forever. 'Deeper in Debt' is CPD fellow Steve Keen's analysis of Australia's looming crisis in housing affordability and private debt.


The housing story: the reality of interest rates

Borrower blindness and confusion over the difference between real and nominal interest rates have contributed to Australia's heavy debt burden, writes Ian McAuley. But education alone won't be enough to change consumer behaviour - changes on the supply side of the credit market are needed.

The risk society

CPD fellow John Quiggin examines the role of government as the ultimate risk manager. He argues that risk will be the defining concept of the 21st century, the way that globalisation was for the 1990s.

REAL WORLD ECONOMICS: invitation to contribute

Critiques of orthodox economics have proliferated in recent times, but often these critiques are not translated into alternative principles for policy-making. The Centre for Policy Development is calling for submissions of articles and papers which explore alternate economic frameworks for policy development.

One Year On: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

CPD fellow James Arvanitakis writes: I am trying to figure out what the Rudds were thinking when they decided to announce a $1.5 billion injection into First Home Owners Grant (FHOG). This seems like sausage factory policy to me, no matter what is happening in the broader local or global economy. Before presenting my thinking on this, I want to emphasise that I am not against government injecting funds into the economy - but only when the policy implications are well thought out. The Rudds seem to have got it right with well-targeted payments to pensioners, low-income households and carers.

Syndicate content

This site is the home of the Centre for Policy Development. It is kindly hosted for us by .
Contact us if you'd like to know more about what you see here.